NewsOpen-flame policy fails to account for smudging practice

Students discuss perceived problems with policy, preventing spiritual freedom at TU
Jolie FrancisSeptember 12, 20192483 min
https://149362186.v2.pressablecdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/smudging2.jpg

Photo by Oliver Chapin-Eiserloh.

While no specific policies about smudging exist at Trinity, the practice is prohibited under the open flame policy.

Smudging is a native indigenous ritual that involves the burning of herbs and cleansing of one’s home to remove any negative or harmful energy.

Trinity’s open flame policy prohibits the use of fire as it poses a fire hazard in residence halls. Additionally, the sensitivity of the smoke detectors can lead to bigger issues, according to Sheryl Tynes, vice president for Student Life.

“In our conversations with Facilities Services, they have reinforced the prohibition of any item that would produce smoke due to the sensitivity of smoke detectors located in each residence hall room. Fire alarm activation requires a response from the San Antonio Fire Department, and it may eventually cause a delay in response to an actual fire,” Tynes wrote over email.

Junior Kayla Padilla performs smudging — or “limpiezas” as she calls it — because she watched her mother do it in their house. The practice to her is a way of preserving indigenous spirituality and having control during times where she may feel powerless. Padilla is an opinion columnist for the Trinitonian.

“To me, personally, it is a form of maintaining peace in one’s home while also creating a sense of control. You can recite a prayer while doing it or create your own words to recite; the point is to use the good inside of us to remove the ugly in the physical world. For people who have often been portrayed as powerless in post-colonial times, this is our way of influencing what we allow into our life,” Padilla said.

In 2017, point-three percent of Trinity students identified as American Indian or Alaska Native.

“Policies come about when a need arises,” said Alex Serna-Wallender, university chaplain. “There hasn’t been some intentional conversation around what should a policy around this look like. So default it falls under that.”

Institutions near the Rocky Mountains, like Montana University, and in other places with higher numbers of indigenous people and students are more likely to have policies specific to practices like smudging.

“Every institution is different and every context is different. Also, the needs of particular students look different. It’s always hard to talk in abstract without having intentional conservations with students to understand the specific needs and requests on how to balance that,” Serna-Wallender said.

Jullian Valadez, president of the Indigenous People’s Club, believes that Trinity has a responsibility to allow indigenous people to practice smudging and other practices core to their identity.

“Smudging is clearly something that ought to be protected and respected by Trinity University. For many indigenous groups and peoples, it functions as a core pillar of spirituality and personal growth and protection. It isn’t merely the burning of items but holds deeply personal meanings to those partaking in this sacred, age-old, ritual. I cannot emphasize just how sacred and important these practices are and how denying individuals access to them functions as another form of white supremacy (and I do not use that word lightly),” Valadez wrote.

Valadez believes that Trinity should take into account their history when forming policy.

“Several other universities across the nation not only designate clear spaces for smudging rituals but actually offer exemptions and administrative support in aiding indigenous students to be able to access and explore the cultural items that compose them and their generational identity. Trinity University, having a shameful history with regards to indigenous people, should value the cultures they aided in eradicating and demonizing and fix their policies regarding smudging. This sort of erasure would never be tolerated with Judeo-Chrisiain religions and the same reverence should apply to Native and Indigenous values,” Valadez wrote.

Both Trinity departments and off-campus institutions would need to be consulted to approve any updates to the open flame policy. These include the Department of Environmental Health and Safety, Facilities Services and Trinity’s insurance provider.

“Like any institution, Trinity policies change over time, and student interests are an important factor in many great changes. It is important to know, however, that this is not solely a decision of the division of Student Life,” Tynes wrote.

Padilla, who has had her smudging materials confiscated by Trinity before, believes that the university has not shown inclusivity to indigenous peoples. Deb Tyson, director of residential life, and Tynes did reach out to Padilla after this event.

“I think it’s very telling Trinity doesn’t have smudging policies. I mean, the ritual itself shouldn’t even be policed on our campus. We know how to do it without setting our room on fire, and the idea of even having to ask permission to practice our ritual is pretty insulting, especially considering Trinity is built on native land,” Padilla said. “So to me, at Trinity, limpiezas means doing what I want, when I want and declaring ancestral rituals superior over ‘campus policy’ that isn’t even inclusive of our spirituality.”

Jolie Francis

| Class of 2021 | Majors: Urban Studies |

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.